Article 31567 of alt.solar.thermal:
Path: news.misty.com!not-for-mail
From: nicksanspam@ece.villanova.edu
Newsgroups: alt.solar.thermal
Subject: Re: cheap and easy space heater panel?
Date: 24 Dec 2008 10:46:30 -0500
Organization: Villanova University
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <gitlgm$jpf@acadia.ece.villanova.edu>
References: <5364b731-021a-480f-92a8-eea359c434a8@k18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <ab917248-0169-4219-a5dc-f27e9698d10b@f18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <gip4c8$jco@acadia.ece.villanova.edu> <52a1ac57-c6de-4c25-a590-9d37f47bd4a3@a12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acadia.ece.villanova.edu
X-Trace: max.inside.misty.com 1230133592 6847 153.104.44.130 (24 Dec 2008 15:46:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@misty.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:46:32 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.misty.com alt.solar.thermal:31567

Father Haskell  <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> >No baffles or absorber panels?
>>
>> Right, altho a transpired mesh absorber (eg dark window screen)
>> would improve efficiency.
>
>How does mesh compare to corrugated aluminum, painted black?

Better and cheaper. A layer of black window screen would reduce reradiation
loss to the glazing and might keep the air between the screen and the glazing
close to 70 F, so a 1'x1' box with R1 glazing would lose (70-30)1ft^2/R1
= 40 Btu/h on a 30 F day. With 90% transmission, it would gain 225 Btu/h
in full sun, for a 185 Btu/h net output.

A panel with 10 cfm of airflow behind it producing H Btu/h of net heat
with a max temp of 70+H/10 and average 70+H/20 and H = 225-glazingloss
= 225-(70+H/20-30)1ft^2/R1 makes H = 185/1.05 = 176, no?

Nick

This seems like a good time to make a "heat trap" like an igloo for
the (20 F) barn cats, with a sleeping platform that's above the top of
an entrance below it, so cat-heated air (which rises) can't escape
through the entrance. We might put a cardboard box upside down on top of
3 strawbales in a U-shape, with a 4" gap between 2 of them so the cats
can enter via the gap/tunnel and climb up to lie on the strawbales
under the box. We could pile strawbales all around and over the box
or drape it all round with rags on the outside.

A 2'x2'x1' tall box with 12 square feet of 1" R4 rag surface and 2
20 watt (68 Btu/h) cats could stay 70 F until the barn temp dropped
to 70-2x68x4/12 = 24.7 F... 2" of rags would make this minus 21.7 F.

Merry Christmas to all, including the kitties (who might prefer a few 
creatures stirring, eg some tasty mice.)



Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:31:10 -0800 (PST)
From: nick pine <nicksanspam@early.com>
Subject: A condensing woodstove chimney?
Newsgroups: alt.energy.homepower

Eli wrote:

>A few year ago, I fooled around with a forced draft of my wood stove
>chimney by installing a duct fan blade near the top of 6" stainless
>steel chimney... for the sake of discussion, assume we can perfect a
>forced draft.  The way to capture the heat going up the chimney is to
>have the first section of pipe above the stove to have a water jacket
>where the flow of water can capture the chimney heat.

Air seems simpler.

>... Cooling the chimney will dampen draft.  I would like to see a
>forced draft with a pressure sensor that would automatically turn on
>when the sensor determines forced draft is needed to overcome reduced
>draft from water jacket or any other reason.

An airtight stove with a combustion air intake port and a manual
adjustment might not need this.

> It seems to me that we could capture a lot more heat from wood
> combustion if we can cool the chimney without risking back draft by
> using a forced draft.

With a condensing chimney, a 20K Btu/h woodstove might produce 3K Btu/h
(15%) more heat, even when burning damp wood. In the calc below,
a counterflow air-air heat exchanger with a 10'x6" flue pipe inside
a 10'x10" pipe with 500 cfm of 70 F room air flowing between them
cool 3 cfm of combustion gas from 600 to 86 F with a 97% heat
exchanger efficacy...

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/fuels-air-flue-gas-d_170.html says
it takes at least 70 cubic feet of air to combust a pound of wood
with a heating value of about 7000 Btu, and bone-dry wood has
20% more (low) heating value than wood with 20% moisture.

20 PI=4*ATN(1)
30 HEAT=20000!'combustion heat (Btu/h)
40 HHV=7000'wood high heating value (Btu/lb)
50 PPH=HEAT/HHV'dry wood consumption (lb/h)
60 CAN=70'combustion air need (ft^3/lb)
70 CMIN=CAN*PPH/60'combustion airflow (cfm)
80 PRINT"Heat (Btu/h):";HEAT,"Wood (lb/h):";PPH,"Cair (cfm):";CMIN
90 LP=10'pipe length (feet)
100 DP=6/12'inner pipe diameter (feet)
110 A=LP*PI*DP'inner pipe area (ft^2)
120 U=3/4'pipe wall conductance (Btu/h-F-ft^2)
130 NTU=A*U/CMIN'Number of Heat Transfer Units
140 CMAX=500'room air fan cfm
150 PRINT"Pipe (ft):";LP,"Fan (cfm):";CMAX,"NTU:";NTU
160 Z=CMIN/CMAX'capacity rate ratio
170 ETERM=EXP(-(1-Z)*NTU)
180 E=(1-ETERM)/(1-Z*ETERM)'heat exchanger efficacy
190 THI=600'incoming flue gas temp (F)
200 TCI=70'incoming room air temp (F)
210 THO=THI-E*(THI-TCI)'outgoing flue gas temp (F)
220 PRINT"Hx Eff:";E,"Thi (F):";THI,,"Tho (F):";THO

Heat (Btu/h): 20000         Wood (lb/h): 2.857143       Cair (cfm): 3.33
Pipe (ft): 10               Fan (cfm): 500              NTU: 3.534292
Hx Eff: .9703182            Thi (F): 600                Tho (F):
85.73138

With a 40K Btu/h fire, the efficacy drops to 83%, but the chimney
still condenses, with Tho < 212...

Heat (Btu/h): 40000         Wood (lb/h): 5.714286       Cair (cfm): 6.66
Pipe (ft): 10               Fan (cfm): 500              NTU: 1.767146
Hx Eff: .8270361            Thi (F): 600                Tho (F):
161.6708

The setup might look like this, in a fixed font like Courier:

                      |<--       10'      -->|
            10" pipe  _______________________________
                   ______________________________c    f room
         6" pipe / --------------------------  --u <= a  air
                 ||   -----------------------||------ n
             flue||                ||        ||_________  cooled flue
              gas||^               ||        ||---------  gas exits-->
                 |||               |||       ||           
                 ||                ||v       cl
          ------- | combustion air ||
         |        |_____________c__||
         | stove  |-------------d---
          --------  intake port           | drip |
           |     |                        |bucket|
-----------------------------------------------------------------


The 6" fluepipe could be inside a 10" pipe with 2 capped 6" Ts and
a 10" T with a 10" to 6" reducer. Grainger's $70.85 4C847 550 cfm
10" fan (controlled by a flue thermostat in series with a room temp
thermostat) could push room air into the 10" pipe and pressurize
the combustion air intake port. Condensate could drip from the lower T
with a liquid trap in a cap cl with a corrosion-resistant liner.

A one-way motorized or passive plastic film damper cd could prevent
reverse combustion airflow as the stove cools. The fresh air side of
the damper box might contain a CO detector that makes an alarm and
turns on the fan if CO appears.

Nick




Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:41:18 -0800 (PST)
From: nick pine <nicksanspam@early.com>
Subject: Re: A condensing woodstove chimney?
Newsgroups: alt.energy.homepower
 
harry <susan.armit...@virgin.net> wrote:

> > The setup might look like this, in a fixed font like Courier:


                   |<--       10'      -->|
         10" pipe  _______________________________
                ______________________________c    f room
      6" pipe / --------------------------  --u <= a  air
              ||   -----------------------||------ n
          flue||                ||        ||_________  cooled flue
           gas||^               ||        ||---------  gas exits-->
              |||               |||       ||           
              ||                ||v       cl
       ------- | combustion air ||
      |        |_____________c__||
      | stove  |-------------d---
       --------  intake port           | drip |
        |     |                        |bucket|
-----------------------------------------------------------------


>The 6" fluepipe could be inside a 10" pipe with 2 capped 6" Ts and
>a 10" T with a 10" to 6" reducer. Grainger's $70.85 4C847 550 cfm
>10" fan (controlled by a flue thermostat in series with a room temp
>thermostat) could push room air into the 10" pipe and pressurize
>the combustion air intake port. Condensate could drip from the lower
>T with a liquid trap in a cap cl with a corrosion-resistant liner.

>A one-way motorized or passive plastic film damper cd could prevent
>reverse combustion airflow as the stove cools. The fresh air side of
>the damper box might contain a CO detector that makes an alarm and
>turns on the fan if CO appears.

> The system you describe is in fact "induced draught". Forced draught
> would be blowing air into the stove (hence pressurising it).

Look at the little down-arrow. The fan blows air into the stove.

> Any such system in a domestic house is foolish because if the fan was to
>fail, you and your family would stand a excellent chance of being gassed...

Hence the combustion air check valve cd and the CO detector/fan
controller.

> There are numerous problems with condensing boilers even with gas
> (which is the simplest to deal with) revolving round the acidity of
> the condensate. You will not get a solid fuelled applianced to work
> on condensing for this reason

What's an "applianced"? The final low-temp part of the fluepipe needs
to be corrosion-resistant, eg PVC.

> also tars and creosotes condense out so insulatiing the heat exchange
> surfaces especially with wood.

"Insulatiing"? "Especially with wood"? Have you too long the German
language speaking been?

>The tars are difficult to remove and if a large amount catches fire

Underwater?

> the heat is so intense the chimney may well melt/burn through and
> burn the building down in the worst case.

Surely there are worser cases.

> Tar deposition is bad enough on ordinary stoves a condensing stove
> would be much worse.

But tars and creosotes would condense out in water.

> It's a good idea to make the top section of the chimney removeable
> for this purpose.

There is no chimney.

> And the wood must be dry or vast amounts of energy are wasted
> evaporatiing the moisture out of the wood.

"Evaporatiing"? This should work fine with damp wood, recovering
all that energy.

> Also tar deposites are increased.

What's a deposite? Tar is a non-flame problem. Maybe the fan should
run regardless of the room temp if the flue gas temp near the stove
ever drops to 300 F, indicating no flames. It might shut off if it
stays below 300 for 5 minutes, when the stove runs out of fuel.

> Woodburners are vastly labour intensive due to the neccesity of
> cutting, stacking, storing and drying the wood.

Good exercise. Warms you twice. You can also burn trash in a woodstove.
My PhD friend Rich Komp says plastic bottles burn just like kerosine,
chemically-speaking.

> They are also filthy objects to have in the house

So are toilets.

>the, ash gets everywhere.

"The, ash"?

> Forget catalytic converters.

OK.

> They are expensive, do not increase efficiency, the precious metals
> are "poisoned" by the combustion products. That is, if the tars
> don't cover them up first.

I'm planning to use this stove:

http://www.homedepot.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10051&langId=-1&catalogId=10053&productId=100291302

which does not have a catalytic converter.

> Harry, heating engineer

Representing the state of the art? :-)

Nick


